Paul Krugman argues that the primary problem facing Europe is a monetary one (my bold):
So what does ail Europe? The truth is that the story is mostly monetary. By introducing a single currency without the institutions needed to make that currency work, Europe effectively reinvented the defects of the gold standard — defects that played a major role in causing and perpetuating the Great Depression.
[...]
If the peripheral nations still had their own currencies, they could and would use devaluation to quickly restore competitiveness. But they don’t, which means that they are in for a long period of mass unemployment and slow, grinding deflation. Their debt crises are mainly a byproduct of this sad prospect, because depressed economies lead to budget deficits and deflation magnifies the burden of debt.
I agree that the Eurozone was a flawed currency union from the start. So yes, what ails Europe is a structural monetary problem. But the monetary problem goes deeper than that. There is also a cyclical monetary problem that is alluded to in the bold passage above. This cyclical dimension can be seen in the figure below:
This figure shows that ECB's failure to stabilize and restore nominal spending to expected levels--as proxied by the 1995-2006 trend--during the crisis as the real culprit behind the Eurozone crisis. This failure to act has been devastating because it means nominal incomes are far lower than were expected when borrowers took out loans fixed in nominal terms. European borrowers, both public and private, are therefore not able to pay back their debt and the result is a fiscal crisis.
The reduced ability for Europeans to payback debt also means that risk premiums on countries with lots of debt or ones perceived to have debt problems increases, further raising these country's debt burden with higher financing costs. The fiscal crisis gets bigger, and being easy to observe, gets wrongly credited as the cause of the Eurozone's problems. Consequently, the Eurozone crisis is prescribed with the fiscal solution of austerity. The real solution, then, requires the ECB to restore nominal incomes to their originally expected values. This is what ails Europe.
You are so right but what is right is of little import to the people who construct our economic system. Their sole motivation is personal enrichment. If it were otherwise the forces of the free market would prevail and banks would be allowed to fail. You can't do half an 'Adam Smith'....
ReplyDeleteYes, Europe needs to think about Adam Smith---and print more money.
ReplyDeleteI contend Adam Smith is to the commercial world, what market monetarism is to the monetary world.
It does no good to have an Adam Smith economy, if the central bank starves the economy. You will still get deflationary recessions of epic length, as in Japan.
Adam Smith+Market Monetarism=Prosperity
I absolutely agree (but was more longwinded about it).
ReplyDeleteBut, in a sense, this reiterates Krugman's point about the euro recapitulating the faults of the gold standard. Do this chart for the 1929-1933 period and you'd get the same thing, because adherence to the gold standard prevented NGDP from rising...
ReplyDelete